-
Manuel Malagón
Updated
After José Manuel Rodríguez Uribespresident of the CSD, said in an interview that Dani Olmo is playing for a LaLiga error and the federation, Javier Tebas He responded with an extensive message in X.
This was the full message of the president of LaLiga.
The president of the CSD has publicly indicated that the responsibility in the case of Dani Olmo is from LaLiga, for having raised the matter in a monitoring commission without competences. Given that statement, it is possible to ask a simple question:
Who then issued the new license of the players Dani Olmo and Pau Víctor?
The CSD resolution itself fails to establish any expedition date, and given that absence, it concludes that the previous licenses were never canceled.
This argument is difficult to sustain, for several reasons:
– The licenses were expressly issued until December 31, 2024, date agreed and signed by the club and the players.
– That date was not symbolic: FC Barcelona himself went to the ordinary jurisdiction requesting urgent precautionary measures before the end of the year, claiming that the licenses expired on December 31.
– This request was denied, but clearly reveals that the club assumed that, as of January 1, the players were unincript.
From there, the thesis of the CSD that “there was no express cancellation” and, therefore, the license remained in force, implies unilaterally reinterpreting a clear documentary fact: the contractual and regulatory validity signed until December 31.
And all this to conclude that the problem was … having taken the matter to an inadequate commission.
With all institutional respect, we believe that the legal fund cannot be reduced to formal debate debates. The relevant thing is when and how a new license was processed (or not), and if the administrative mechanisms were used in a manner consistent with their own acts of the interested parties.
Sometimes, in the attempt to divert the focus, it is forgotten that administrative law also requires consistency, motivation and legal certainty.