Home » Premier League Fixtures » Rodríguez Uribes: “When There Are Serious Indications Of Nullity, The First Thing Is To Avoid Damage”

Rodríguez Uribes: “When There Are Serious Indications Of Nullity, The First Thing Is To Avoid Damage”

by football
rodriguez-uribes:-“when-there-are-serious-indications-of-nullity,-the-first-thing-is-to-avoid-damage”
  • efe agency

The president of the Higher Sports Council (CSD), José Manuel Rodríguez Uribesdefended that “when serious indications of nullity are observed in a decision, the first thing is to avoid damage”, in reference to the precautionary measure granted to FC Barcelona for the registration of Dani Olmo and Pau Víctor.

Rodriguez Uribes This was expressed this Saturday on social networks, for the first time after the CSD approved Barça’s request on the 8th and the announcement made on Friday by LaLiga to judicially appeal the decision, which is contrary to what was agreed by the employers and by the monitoring committee of its coordination agreement with the Royal Spanish Football Federation (RFEF).

“We jurists know that the Law is made up of rules, principles, values ​​and rights. Also of forms and procedures and, before that, of powers. Well, when serious indications of nullity are observed in a decision, the first thing is to avoid damage Primum non nocere,” he wrote.

Clubs like Atlético de Madrid, Athletic Club, Sevilla, Las Palmas, Espanyol, Alavés or Málaga have questioned the CSD’s decision.

The Council argued to grant the precautionary measure the possible concurrence of a cause of nullity by operation of law and the existence of immediate damages that would be difficult to repair, which would affect the rights of the players recognized in the Sports Law.

Also that the non-adoption of the precautionary measure would cause serious economic and sporting damage for the club and, above all, for the footballers, while it could also damage the interests of the Spanish team, as well as the rest of the national competitions. , included LaLiga.

Rodriguez Uribes He also responded on Friday on social networks to the Popular Party spokesperson, Borja Semperwho maintained that “the Government’s decision, against the norm and against the criteria of the Federation and the League, is a favorable treatment for a club and adulterates the competition” and doubted that “this amnesty would have been granted to a club smaller.”

Read also

“You are scandalized by a precautionary measure (temporary by definition), which protects an excellent player of the Spanish team, and you are not moved by the election of the new president of the Federation sentenced to 7 years of disqualification. Is it because he is from the PP?” , he also indicated on social networks.

The popular parliamentary group has launched an initiative in Congress and the Senate with questions to the Government about the CSD decision.

Related Articles

Leave a Comment